Bell's theorem is a conflict of mathematical predictions formulated within an infinite hierarchy of mathematical models. Inequalities formulated at level $k\in\mathbb{Z}$, are violated by probabilities at level $k+1$. We are inclined to think that $k=0$ corresponds to the the classical world, while the quantum one is $k=1$. However, as the $k=0$ inequalities are violated by $k=1$ probabilities, the same relation holds between $k=1$ inequalities violated by $k=2$ probabilities, $k=-1$ inequalities, violated by $k=0$ probabilities, and so forth. Accepting the logic of the Bell theorem, can we prove by induction that nothing exists?

贝尔定理是一种数学预测的冲突，它是在一个 数学模型的无限层次。在水平上形成的不平等 $k\in\mathbb{Z}$，被级别为$k+1$的概率所违反。我们倾向于 认为$k=0$对应于经典世界，而量子 其一是$k=1$。然而，由于$k=0$违反了$k=1$ 概率，同样的关系在$k=1$不等之间成立 $k=2$概率，$k=-1$不等，违反$k=0$概率，以及 以此类推。接受贝尔定理的逻辑，我们能用归纳法证明吗 什么都不存在？